lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bBpuiLf7y7qVDoo3k6vajoaTkrDNx+pnNBTMYY616iDwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:21:07 -0500
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

Stephen, do you want to send a new patch based on the current
linux-next, or do you want me to send an updated version?

Thank you,
Pasha

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:36 PM Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com> wrote:
>
> > > After the most recent build errors, I tried to apply Pavel's patch
> > >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CA+CK2bBjC8=cRsL5VhWkcevPsqSXWhsANVjsFNMERLT8vWtiQw@mail.gmail.com/
> > > but patch said that it was already applied (by Andrew I think),
> > > so I bailed out (gave up).
> >
> > As far as I can tell, there are two different bugs that got mixed up, and
> > we need both Pavel's patch (which is now in -next) and Stephen's
> > (which got dropped again).
>
> Stephen's patch looks OK to me. I should have used define instead of
> inline to begin with.
>
> Thank you,
> Pasha
>
> >
> >         Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ