linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210203234116.839819-2-dlatypov@google.com>
Date:   Wed,  3 Feb 2021 15:41:14 -0800
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites

E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name.
  kunit.filter_glob=list*

Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of
suites we intend to run.
So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we
need to do the filtering here in the executor.
It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't
want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules.

This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y.
But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue.

For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies
of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them.

The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider
extending it to a syntax like:
  kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob>
E.g. to run all the del list tests
  kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del*

But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in
test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select
specific suites.
So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
 lib/kunit/Kconfig    |  1 +
 lib/kunit/executor.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/Kconfig b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
index 00909e6a2443..0b5dfb001bac 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 menuconfig KUNIT
 	tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests"
+	select GLOB if KUNIT=y
 	help
 	  Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit
 	  testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index a95742a4ece7..25a891285816 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/glob.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 
 /*
  * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in
@@ -11,14 +13,79 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[];
 
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 
-static void kunit_print_tap_header(void)
+static char *filter_glob;
+module_param(filter_glob, charp, 0);
+
+static struct kunit_suite * const *
+kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite)
+{
+	int i, n = 0;
+	struct kunit_suite **filtered;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			++n;
+	}
+
+	if (n == 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!filtered)
+		return NULL;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			filtered[n++] = subsuite[i];
+	}
+	filtered[n] = NULL;
+
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+struct suite_set {
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *start;
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *end;
+};
+
+static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite;
+	struct suite_set filtered;
+
+	const size_t max = __kunit_suites_end - __kunit_suites_start;
+
+	if (!filter_glob) {
+		filtered.start = __kunit_suites_start;
+		filtered.end = __kunit_suites_end;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL);
+	filtered.start = copy;
+	if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */
+		filtered.end = copy;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
+		filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(__kunit_suites_start[i]);
+		if (filtered_subsuite)
+			*copy++ = filtered_subsuite;
+	}
+	filtered.end = copy;
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
 	int num_of_suites = 0;
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
+	for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
 		for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
 			num_of_suites++;
 
@@ -30,12 +97,18 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
 
-	kunit_print_tap_header();
+	struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
+
+	kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
+
+	for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+		__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
-			__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
+	if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
+		for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+			kfree(suites);
+		kfree(suite_set.start);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog