[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4600991FC47D2E5A7E013F0CF7B49@OSBPR01MB4600.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:02:12 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: 'John Garry' <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf vendor events: Support PMU events for A64FX
Hi, John
> Just some things to note:
> - please pick up and apply reviewed-by tags granted from previous reviews if
> explicitly granted, subject to making any trivial changes requested If any
> significant changes are made, then don't pick up theses tags or drop them (if they
> were picked up earlier)
I will fix.
> - I'd say that it's best not to send my patch in 1/4, but better to mention the series
> which this is based on in your cover letter Sending my patch is only going to make
> the maintainers (Arnaldo) life more difficult to track these things.
I will fix.
> Apart from that, I think that we're a bit uncertain about patch 3/4
What are your concerns?
I think it's okay for perf to read a new event code with a number at the beginning.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists