lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210203093329.1617808-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed,  3 Feb 2021 17:33:28 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/vt-d: Apply SATC policy

From: Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>

Starting from Intel VT-d v3.2, Intel platform BIOS can provide a new SATC
table structure. SATC table lists a set of SoC integrated devices that
require ATC to work (VT-d specification v3.2, section 8.8). Furthermore,
the new version of IOMMU supports SoC device ATS in both its Scalable mode
and legacy mode.

When IOMMU is working in scalable mode, software must enable device ATS
support. On the other hand, when IOMMU is in legacy mode for whatever
reason, the hardware managed ATS will automatically take effect and the
SATC required devices can work transparently to the software. As the
result, software shouldn't enable ATS on that device, otherwise duplicate
device TLB invalidations will occur.

Signed-off-by: Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index ee0932307d64..3e30c340e6a9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -872,6 +872,60 @@ static bool iommu_is_dummy(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static bool iommu_support_ats(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
+{
+	return ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap);
+}
+
+static bool device_support_ats(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	return pci_ats_supported(dev) && dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(dev);
+}
+
+static int segment_atc_required(u16 segment)
+{
+	struct acpi_dmar_satc *satc;
+	struct dmar_satc_unit *satcu;
+	int ret = 1;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(satcu, &dmar_satc_units, list) {
+		satc = container_of(satcu->hdr, struct acpi_dmar_satc, header);
+		if (satcu->atc_required && satcu->devices_cnt &&
+		    satc->segment == segment)
+			goto out;
+	}
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int device_atc_required(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct dmar_satc_unit *satcu;
+	struct acpi_dmar_satc *satc;
+	struct device *tmp;
+	int i, ret = 1;
+
+	dev = pci_physfn(dev);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(satcu, &dmar_satc_units, list) {
+		satc = container_of(satcu->hdr, struct acpi_dmar_satc, header);
+		if (!satcu->atc_required ||
+		    satc->segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus))
+			continue;
+
+		for_each_dev_scope(satcu->devices, satcu->devices_cnt, i, tmp)
+			if (to_pci_dev(tmp) == dev)
+				goto out;
+	}
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
+}
+
 struct intel_iommu *device_to_iommu(struct device *dev, u8 *bus, u8 *devfn)
 {
 	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd = NULL;
@@ -2555,10 +2609,16 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 	if (dev && dev_is_pci(dev)) {
 		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(info->dev);
 
-		if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
-		    pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
-		    dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(pdev))
-			info->ats_supported = 1;
+		/*
+		 * Support ATS by default if it's supported by both IOMMU and
+		 * client sides, except that the device's ATS is required by
+		 * ACPI/SATC but the IOMMU scalable mode is disabled. In that
+		 * case the hardware managed ATS will be automatically used.
+		 */
+		if (iommu_support_ats(iommu) && device_support_ats(pdev)) {
+			if (!device_atc_required(pdev) || sm_supported(iommu))
+				info->ats_supported = 1;
+		}
 
 		if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
 			if (pasid_supported(iommu)) {
@@ -3155,6 +3215,11 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
 	 * endfor
 	 */
 	for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) {
+		if (pci_ats_disabled() && segment_atc_required(drhd->segment)) {
+			pr_warn("Scalable mode disabled -- Use hardware managed ATS because PCIe ATS is disabled but some devices in PCIe segment 0x%x require it.",
+				drhd->segment);
+			intel_iommu_sm = 0;
+		}
 		/*
 		 * lock not needed as this is only incremented in the single
 		 * threaded kernel __init code path all other access are read
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ