linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add compatible for mt8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:31:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: mtk-xhci: add compatible
 for mt8195

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:26:40PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> There are 4 USB controllers on MT8195, the controllers (IP1~IP3,
> exclude IP0) have a wrong default SOF/ITP interval which is
> calculated from the frame counter clock 24Mhz by default, but
> in fact, the frame counter clock is 48Mhz, so we should set
> the accurate interval according to 48Mhz. Here add a new compatible
> for MT8195, it's also supported in driver. But the first controller
> (IP0) has no such issue, we prefer to use generic compatible,
> e.g. mt8192's compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> ---
> v2: no changes

Note, I do not apply patches with "RFC" as obviously you do not think
they are worthy of being applied.  I don't see what you are asking to be
done with this set of patches, please explain?

thanks,

greg k-h