lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210203105955.GF1239129@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:29:55 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        huyue2@...ong.com, zbestahu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Switch to sched_debug() for conditional
 sched domain printk

* Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com> [2021-02-03 18:10:19]:

> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:22:56 +0530
> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > * Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com> [2021-02-03 12:20:10]:
> > 
> > 
> > sched_debug() would only be present in CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG. Right?
> > In which case there would be a build failure with your change in
> > !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG config.
> > 
> > or Am I missing something?
> 
> sched_debug() is also defined for !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG as below:
> 
> static inline bool sched_debug(void)
> {
> 	return false;
> }
> 

ah .. right .. somehow I missed this. 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ