[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9A811B32-6E3D-4FE1-98A5-A7922C32CDB4@icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:41:58 +0800
From: Abel Wu <abel.w@...oud.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, hewenliang4@...wei.com,
wuyun.wu@...wei.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: embed __slab_alloc to its caller
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021, Abel Wu wrote:
>
>> Since slab_alloc_node() is the only caller of __slab_alloc(), embed
>> __slab_alloc() to its caller to save function call overhead. This
>> will also expand the caller's code block size a bit, but hackbench
>> tests on both host and guest didn't show a difference w/ or w/o
>> this patch.
>
> slab_alloc_node is an always_inline function. It is intentional that only
> the fast path was inlined and not the slow path.
Oh I got it. Thanks for your excellent explanation.
Best Regards,
Abel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists