[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210203132051.GC4880@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:20:51 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Argus Lin <argus.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jack Yu <jack.yu@...ltek.com>,
Shuming Fan <shumingf@...ltek.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jiaxin Yu (俞家鑫) <Jiaxin.Yu@...iatek.com>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>,
Shane Chien (簡佑軒)
<Shane.Chien@...iatek.com>,
ChiPeng Chang (張琦朋)
<chipeng.chang@...iatek.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add mediatek MT6359 accdet driver
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Argus Lin wrote:
> Dear maintainers:
> Can you reply to me if any opinion?
> thanks
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
IIRC I did review this...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists