lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de50b6b8c867ec1f88df54f92134a99b086da8ac.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:50:22 -0500
From:   Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment
 discard requests correctly

On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 03:15 +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/2/21 18:39, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +		/* fall through */
> >  	case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> > -		return 0;
> 
> I don't think returning 1 for write-zeroes is right,
> did you test this patch with write-zeores enabled controller with
> the right fs that triggers this behavior ?
> 
> 
I tested the first iteration of the patch fully mounting an XFS file
system with -o discard and creating and deleting files.
That was our specific RHEL8 failure we were handling here with David's
first submission.

I can test his most recent, I have not done that yet.
Again, please follow up with exactly what you want based against
David's patch and I can test that.

Regards
Laurence 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ