[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ddd5bdf-0484-3c20-1b6e-5573d1ff90f6@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:02:00 -0600
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] leds: lp50xx: remove unused regulator
Pavel
On 2/3/21 8:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2021-02-03 07:49:35, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Pavel
>>
>> On 2/3/21 3:02 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Wed 2021-02-03 08:34:08, Sven Schuchmann wrote:
>>>> The regulator for vled-supply is unused in the driver.
>>>> It is just assigned from DT and disabled in lp50xx_remove.
>>>> So the code can be removed from the driver.
>>> Dan, what is going on here? Do we need to also enable the regulator,
>>> or is the removal correct thing to do?
>>>
>> I think it would be better to do an enable as opposed to removing the code.
>>
>> This would be needed especially in applications that have to meet strict
>> power management requirements.
>>
>> Users may want to disable or enable the regulator during suspend/resume.
>> Otherwise it would be considered always-on and the regulator does not need
>> to be populated.
> Do you have set up where this is needed and you can test this? Will
> you submit the fixes?
No I use an always on regulator in my setup. I have no managed supplies
exposed.
Dan
> Best regards,
>
> Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists