linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add USB and PHY device nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:05:52 -0800
From:   Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add USB and PHY device
 nodes

Hi Vinod,

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:39:03PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> From: Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Add device nodes for the two instances each of USB3 controllers,
> QMP SS PHYs and SNPS HS PHYs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>
> Message-Id: <20210116013802.1609-2-jackp@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 179 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> index e3597e2a22ab..e51d9ca0210c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
> @@ -592,6 +592,185 @@ rpmhcc: clock-controller {
>  			};
>  
>  		};
> +
> +		usb_1_hsphy: phy@...3000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm8350-usb-hs-phy",
> +				     "qcom,usb-snps-hs-7nm-phy";
> +			reg = <0 0x088e3000 0 0x400>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +			#phy-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ref";
> +
> +			resets = <&gcc 20>;

Shouldn't this (and all the other gcc phandles below) use the
dt-bindings macros from here?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20210118044321.2571775-5-vkoul@kernel.org/

Jack
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project