[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210204184311.xuqlrenlth2vi236@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:43:11 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"pasha.tatashin@...een.com" <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/16] x86/hyperv: implement an MSI domain for root
partition
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 06:40:55PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 9:57 AM
[...]
> > I've got the following diff to fix both issues. If you're happy with the
> > changes, can you give your Reviewed-by? That saves a round of posting.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
> > index 0cabc9aece38..fa71db798465 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > /*
> > - * for Linux to run as the root partition on Microsoft Hypervisor.
> > + * Irqdomain for Linux to run as the root partition on Microsoft Hypervisor.
> > *
> > * Authors:
> > * Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static int hv_map_interrupt(union hv_device_id device_id, bool level,
> > struct hv_device_interrupt_descriptor *intr_desc;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > u64 status;
> > - cpumask_t mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
> > + const cpumask_t *mask;
> > int nr_bank, var_size;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ static int hv_map_interrupt(union hv_device_id device_id, bool
> > level,
> > else
> > intr_desc->trigger_mode = HV_INTERRUPT_TRIGGER_MODE_EDGE;
> >
> > - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &mask);
> > + mask = cpumask_of(cpu);
> > intr_desc->target.vp_set.valid_bank_mask = 0;
> > intr_desc->target.vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARSE_4K;
> > - nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(intr_desc->target.vp_set), &mask);
> > + nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(intr_desc->target.vp_set), mask);
>
> Can you just do the following and get rid of the 'mask' local entirely?
>
> nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(intr_desc->target.vp_set), cpumask_of(cpu));
Sure. That can be done.
>
> Either way,
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Thank you.
Wei.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists