[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czxffrde.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:35:41 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: /proc/loadavg: add 3 more field
descriptions
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> writes:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Update contents of /proc/loadavg: add 3 more fields.
...except that two of those fields are actually a single field with a
slash in the middle.
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20210202.orig/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> +++ linux-next-20210202/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> @@ -687,7 +687,10 @@ files are there, and which are missing.
> kcore Kernel core image (can be ELF or A.OUT(deprecated in 2.4))
> kmsg Kernel messages
> ksyms Kernel symbol table
> - loadavg Load average of last 1, 5 & 15 minutes
> + loadavg Load average of last 1, 5 & 15 minutes;
> + number of processes currently runnable (running or on ready queue);
> + total number of processes in system;
Given that those two fields (for reasons certainly unknown to me) are
different than the rest, it seems like we should actually explain how
they are formatted.
> + last pid created.
> locks Kernel locks
> meminfo Memory info
> misc Miscellaneous
The patch is an improvement over what's there now, so I've applied it,
but it seems like a further tweak might be called for.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists