linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: sunxi: Add Allwinner SoC PWM controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YBxvr9WFlZac8rlO@ulmo>
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 23:05:35 +0100
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Ban Tao <fengzheng923@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mripard@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: sunxi: Add Allwinner SoC PWM controller driver

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:54:36PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:38:40PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > All I'm saying is that I don't think we need to require everyone to
> > adopt a prefix, especially if this hasn't been followed consistently,
> > because then we don't actually gain anything.
> 
> Is "we didn't do this consistently in the past" a reason to never
> improve here? I hope it's not ...

You're implying that consistently using a prefix is an improvement. I
don't agree, so I don't see a need to introduce any new rules for this.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)