[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae346027-a58e-e773-60ce-92a79f0d99d6@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:20:35 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Add SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge
On 2/4/21 11:29 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:42:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> SN65DSI84 is a Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge from
>> Texas Instruments.
>>
>> SN65DSI83, SN65DSI85 are variants of the same family of bridge
>> controllers.
>>
>> Right now the bridge driver is supporting a single link, dual-link
>> support requires to initiate I2C Channel B registers.
>
> MArek Vasut (on CC) has very recently posted a driver for the SN65DSI86.
> Should the two drivers be merged together ?
Since Jagan's V1 was out first, I will let Jagan pick whatever might be
useful from the driver I posted, probably the O(1) clock rate
calculation and some of the regmap stuff, and once there is some merged
result, I am happy to test it on my hardware. The DSI83 is I think the
same as DSI84, except with half of the channels.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists