[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210204105320.46072-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:53:20 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
The rule of list walk has gone since:
commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
list_for_each_entry().
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 17 ++---------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6c7f1ea3955e..43341bd7ea1c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6891,24 +6891,11 @@ static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
{
struct uncharge_gather ug;
- struct list_head *next;
+ struct page *page;
uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
-
- /*
- * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
- * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
- */
- next = page_list->next;
- do {
- struct page *page;
-
- page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
- next = page->lru.next;
-
+ list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
uncharge_page(page, &ug);
- } while (next != page_list);
-
uncharge_batch(&ug);
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists