[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210204110508.xgl7drlubv3mhqm7@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:35:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq
On 04-02-21, 17:46, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> > Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
I am not sure if keeping both Acked-by and Reviewed-by make sense. I
am keeping Acked-by as it was the latest of the two, lemme know your
opinion as well.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists