linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rt2x00: remove duplicate word and fix typo in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bcae0800-8ed3-b33a-9489-03e7d9b82840@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:56:46 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     samirweng1979 <samirweng1979@....com>, stf_xl@...pl,
        helmut.schaa@...glemail.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt2x00: remove duplicate word and fix typo in comment

On 2/3/21 4:51 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
> 
> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
> change 'then' to 'than' in comment
> 
> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> index c861811..ad95f9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	 * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
>  	 * either the alignment is already present between
>  	 * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
> -	 * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
> +	 * have to move the header less than the iv_len
>  	 * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
>  	 * for the iv data.
>  	 * When the alignment must be added manually we must
> 


-- 
~Randy