linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 13/37] cpufreq: scmi: port driver to the new scmi_perf_proto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:43:18 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        lukasz.luba@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        etienne.carriere@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/37] cpufreq: scmi: port driver to the new
 scmi_perf_proto_ops interface

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:10:35PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi Viresh
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:33:45AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 02-02-21, 22:15, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > > Port driver to the new SCMI Perf interface based on protocol handles
> > > and common devm_get_ops().
> > >
> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > > ---
> > > v4 --> v5
> > > - using renamed devm_get/put_protocol
> >
> > Can this go through the PM tree ?
> >

Just to be clear, this is targeted for v5.13 not v5.12 in case you are
worried about some conflicts.

>
> It's part of a long series changing internal and external SCMI
> interfaces, series including a bit of per-protocol transient code added
> and removed around this patch to maintain bisectability along the way...
>
> ...I'd not recommend split this patch out and committ it out of the series,
> if this is what you meant.
>
> Anyway up to Sudeep really.
>

I prefer to get the entire series merged at once too. We can see if there
are any conflicts once I start merging them more v5.12-rc1 or later.

--
Regards,
Sudeep