linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ACPI: battery: Clean up printing messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <056c6a20-4957-e112-6a8f-62fe39247e56@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:18:29 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        "Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ACPI: battery: Clean up printing messages

On 2021/2/4 2:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki<rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
> in battery.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
> respectively, which among other things causes the excessive log
> level of the messages previously printed via ACPI_EXCEPTION() to
> be increased.
> 
> Drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not
> used any more, drop the no longer needed ACPI_BATTERY_COMPONENT
> definition from the headers and update the documentation accordingly.
> 
> While at it, update the pr_fmt() definition and drop the unneeded
> PREFIX sybmbol definition from battery.c.  Also adapt the existing
> pr_info() calls to the new pr_fmt() definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki<rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>

Thanks
Hanjun