[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBwLtbqZFeqXkmTn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:59:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Morehouse <mascasa@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Process-wide watchpoints
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 02:35:36PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> I meant that we could restrict synchronous SIGTRAP for (1)
> perf_event_open(pid != 0) and (2) disable it after exec.
Hmm, I think I finally get what you're after. And yes, multi-process or
fork() based thingies are common and might well work too.
disable_on_exec isn't quite right though, it needs to be something that
kills the events entirely. I'll think about it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists