linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 103/142] Revert "block: end bio with BLK_STS_AGAIN in case of non-mq devs and REQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YBwM7mN4TNXWHpi/@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:04:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 103/142] Revert "block: end bio with BLK_STS_AGAIN in
 case of non-mq devs and REQ_NOWAIT"

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:36:18AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/3/21 4:59 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2021-02-03 15:58:33 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 2/3/21 3:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:28:26PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>>> On 2021-02-03 14:03:09 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>>> On v5.4.43-101-gbba91cdba612 this fails with
> >>>>>> fio: io_u error on file /mnt/t2/test.0.0: Input/output error: write offset=0, buflen=4096
> >>>>>> fio: pid=734, err=5/file:io_u.c:1834, func=io_u error, error=Input/output error
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> whereas previously it worked. libaio still works...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't checked which major kernel version fixed this again, but I did
> >>>>>> verify that it's still broken in 5.4.94 and that 5.10.9 works.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would suspect it's
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> commit 4503b7676a2e0abe69c2f2c0d8b03aec53f2f048
> >>>>>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> >>>>>> Date:   2020-06-01 10:00:27 -0600
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     io_uring: catch -EIO from buffered issue request failure
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     -EIO bubbles up like -EAGAIN if we fail to allocate a request at the
> >>>>>>     lower level. Play it safe and treat it like -EAGAIN in terms of sync
> >>>>>>     retry, to avoid passing back an errant -EIO.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     Catch some of these early for block based file, as non-mq devices
> >>>>>>     generally do not support NOWAIT. That saves us some overhead by
> >>>>>>     not first trying, then retrying from async context. We can go straight
> >>>>>>     to async punt instead.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> which isn't in stable/linux-5.4.y
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you test that if the above commit is added, all works well again?
> >>>>
> >>>> It doesn't apply cleanly, I'll try to resolve the conflict. However, I
> >>>> assume that the revert was for a concrete reason - but I can't quite
> >>>> figure out what b0beb28097fa04177b3769f4bb7a0d0d9c4ae76e was concretely
> >>>> solving, and whether reverting the revert in 5.4 would re-introduce a
> >>>> different problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> commit b0beb28097fa04177b3769f4bb7a0d0d9c4ae76e (tag: block-5.7-2020-05-29, linux-block/block-5.7)
> >>>> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> >>>> Date:   2020-05-28 13:19:29 -0600
> >>>>
> >>>>     Revert "block: end bio with BLK_STS_AGAIN in case of non-mq devs and REQ_NOWAIT"
> >>>>
> >>>>     This reverts commit c58c1f83436b501d45d4050fd1296d71a9760bcb.
> >>>>
> >>>>     io_uring does do the right thing for this case, and we're still returning
> >>>>     -EAGAIN to userspace for the cases we don't support. Revert this change
> >>>>     to avoid doing endless spins of resubmits.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.6
> >>>>     Reported-by: Bijan Mottahedeh <bijan.mottahedeh@...cle.com>
> >>>>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> >>>>
> >>>> I suspect it just wasn't aimed at 5.4, and that's that, but I'm not
> >>>> sure. In which case presumably reverting
> >>>> bba91cdba612fbce4f8575c5d94d2b146fb83ea3 would be the right fix, not
> >>>> backporting 4503b7676a2e0abe69c2f2c0d8b03aec53f2f048 et al.
> > 
> > Having looked a bit more through the history, I suspect that the reason
> > 5.6 doesn't need c58c1f83436b501d45d4050fd1296d71a9760bcb - which I have
> > confirmed - is that ext4 was converted to the iomap infrastructure in
> > 5.5, but not in 5.4.
> > 
> > I've confirmed that the repro I shared upthread triggers in
> > 378f32bab3714f04c4e0c3aee4129f6703805550^ but not in
> > 378f32bab3714f04c4e0c3aee4129f6703805550.
> 
> I checked up on this, and I do see the issue as well. As far as
> io_uring is concerned, we don't need that revert in 5.4. So I think
> the right solution here would be to... revert the revert :-)

Thanks for looking at this, I'll go revert the revert now.

greg k-h