[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB657522B94AB436CF096460F6FCB29@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:06:18 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"daejun7.park@...sung.com" <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v19 3/3] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region
> > > + put_unaligned_be64(ppn, &cdb[6]);
> >
> > You are assuming the HPB entries read out by "HPB Read Buffer" cmd
> > are
> > in Little
> > Endian, which is why you are using put_unaligned_be64 here. However,
> > this assumption
> > is not right for all the other flash vendors - HPB entries read out
> > by
> > "HPB Read Buffer"
> > cmd may come in Big Endian, if so, their random read performance are
> > screwed.
>
> For this question, it is very hard to make a correct format since the
> Spec doesn't give a clear definition. Should we have a default format,
> if there is conflict, and then add quirk or add a vendor-specific
> table?
>
> Hi Avri
> Do you have a good idea?
I don't know. Better let Daejun answer this.
This was working for me for both Galaxy S20 (Exynos) as well as Xiaomi Mi10 (8250).
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists