[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210204175628.7904d1da@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:56:28 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@...rix.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/netback: avoid race in
xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available()
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:32:32 +0100 Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 04.02.21 00:48, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:09:38 +0100 Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Since commit 23025393dbeb3b8b3 ("xen/netback: use lateeoi irq binding")
> >> xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available() is no longer called only from the rx
> >> queue kernel thread, so it needs to access the rx queue with the
> >> associated queue held.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@...rix.com>
> >> Fixes: 23025393dbeb3b8b3 ("xen/netback: use lateeoi irq binding")
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> >
> > Should we route this change via networking trees? I see the bug did not
> > go through networking :)
>
> I'm fine with either networking or the Xen tree. It should be included
> in 5.11, though. So if you are willing to take it, please do so.
All right, applied to net, it'll most likely hit Linus's tree on Tue.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists