[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210205202022.4515-2-dirk@gouders.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:20:22 +0100
From: Dirk Gouders <dirk@...ders.net>
To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Dirk Gouders <dirk@...ders.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] tpm_tis: handle -EPROBE_DEFER in tpm_tis_plat_probe()
tpm_tis does not consider -EPROBE_DEFER in tpm_tis_plat_probe().
Instead, without notification it falls back to polling mode if
platform_get_irq_optional() returns a negative value.
This could lead to different behavior depending on wether tpm_tis was
compiled builtin or as a module; in the latter case
platform_get_irq_optional() often if not always returns a valid IRQ
number on the first attempt.
Harmonize builtin and module behavior by returning -EPROBE_DEFER,
effectively putting the device on the deferred probe list for later
probe attempts.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@...ders.net>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index 4ed6e660273a..4cf863704aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -320,6 +320,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
tpm_info.irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
if (tpm_info.irq <= 0) {
+ if (tpm_info.irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ /* Enter deferred probe list and try again, later. */
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
if (pdev != force_pdev)
tpm_info.irq = -1;
else
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists