linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Move common exit handlers to x86.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4eef9d7-a510-048e-df3d-f2f87ac77c3b@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:20:00 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Move common exit handlers to x86.c

On 05/02/21 01:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Paolo, I based this on kvm/queue under the assumption it can all wait until
> 5.13.  I don't think there's anything urgent here, and the conflicts with
> the stuff in kvm/nested-svm are annoying.  Let me know if you want me to
> rebase anything/all to get something into 5.12, I know 5.12 is a little
> light on x86 changes :-D.

Yes, we can make it wait for 5.13.

I'm thinking also of taking the occasion to split x86.c further.  But I 
think it's better to move the ioctl interfaces out of x86.c, so for the 
purpose of this series it is okay to add more stuff to that file.

Paolo