lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:25:35 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, sprabhu@...hat.com, christian@...uner.io,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add namespace tags that can be used for matching without pinning a ns

Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:

> > + * init_ns_common - Initialise the common part of a namespace
> 
> Nit: init_ns_common()

Interesting.  The majority of code doesn't put the brackets in.

> I've used lately (e.g. arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c) along the lines:
> 
> * Return:
> * - 0:          Initialization was successful.
> * - -ENOMEM:    Out of memory.

Actually, looking at kernel-doc.rst, this isn't necessarily the recommended
approach as it will much everything into one line, complete with dashes, and
can't handle splitting over lines.  You probably meant:

      * Return:
      * * 0		- OK to runtime suspend the device
      * * -EBUSY	- Device should not be runtime suspended

> * Return:
> * - 0:          Initialization was successful.
> * - -ENOMEM:    Out of memory.
> 
> Looking at the implementation, I guess this is a complete representation of
> what it can return?

It isn't.  It can return at least -ENOSPC as well, but it's awkward detailing
the errors from functions it calls since they can change and then the
description here is wrong.  I'm not sure there's a perfect answer to that.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ