linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft replaced udelay with usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YB0QlMk4Gae1IGjd@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:32:04 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mayank Suman <mayanksuman@...e.com>
Cc:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft replaced udelay with usleep_range

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:41:13PM +0530, Mayank Suman wrote:
> According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, usleep_range is
> preffered over udelay for >=10us delay.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mayank Suman <mayanksuman@...e.com>

ALWAYS test build your patches before sending them out to the world for
review.  You don't want to make maintainers grumpy by breaking the tree
with changes that can not compile, right?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h