[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210204211154.091926005@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:49:04 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation
Embracing a callout into instrumentation_begin() / instrumentation_begin()
does not really make sense. Make the latter instrumentation_end().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/entry/common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static void __xen_pv_evtchn_do_upcall(vo
instrumentation_begin();
run_on_irqstack_cond(__xen_pv_evtchn_do_upcall, regs);
- instrumentation_begin();
+ instrumentation_end();
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists