[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG3jFyu4JvH7iDriQWdwgkVaHH=vjGaVwF3P7DWLRbb19pKxsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:43:14 +0100
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...gle.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sheng Pan <span@...logixsemi.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: anx7625: enable DSI EOTP
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 23:25, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:59 PM Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > W dniu 04.02.2021 o 13:34, Nicolas Boichat pisze:
> > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:07 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >> Hi Xin,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the patch.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 12:17, Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com> wrote:
> > >>> Enable DSI EOTP feature for fixing some panel screen constance
> > >>> shift issue.
> > >>> Removing MIPI flag MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET to enable DSI EOTP.
Does "constance shift" have a typo? Should it be "constant shift"?
With that sorted out feel free to add my r-b.
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
> > >> I don't think I quite understand how removing the
> > >> MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET flag will cause DSI EOTP to be enabled. Could
> > >> you extrapolate on this in the commit message?
> > > That confused me as well, but it turns out that's how the flag is defined:
> > > ```
> > > /* disable EoT packets in HS mode */
> > > #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET BIT(9)
> > > ```
> > > (https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=5bd95ebd-044267fb-5bd8d5f2-0cc47a3003e8-ce9db8ea264d6901&q=1&e=900556dc-d199-4c18-9432-5c3465a98eae&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Finclude%2Fdrm%2Fdrm_mipi_dsi.h%23L129)
> > >
> > > I'm almost tempted to put together a mass patch to rename all of these flags...
> >
> >
> > Yes that would be good, many of these flags were just copy pasted from
> > some hw datasheet, without good analysis how to adapt them to the framework.
>
> I'll look into it (but that shouldn't block this patch).
Thanks for clearing this up Nicolas & Andrzej!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists