linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: X86: Expose PKS to guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:56:03 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: X86: Expose PKS to guest

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/02/21 09:37, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > index 57718716cc70..8027f854c600 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
> > @@ -390,3 +390,9 @@ void pks_key_free(int pkey)
> >  	__clear_bit(pkey, &pks_key_allocation_map);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pks_key_free);
> > +
> > +u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
> > +{
> > +	return this_cpu_read(pkrs_cache);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_current_pkrs);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pkeys.h b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > index bed0e293f13b..480429020f4c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pkeys.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ static inline void pks_mk_readwrite(int pkey)
> >  {
> >  	pr_err("%s is not valid without PKS support\n", __func__);
> >  }
> > +static inline u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
> > +{
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> >  #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS */
> 
> This would need an ack from the x86 people.  Andy, Boris?

This looks like the PKS baremetal pile needs to be upstream first.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette