linux-kernel - AW: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8P190MB063473FEA37E69E6DF6BC5F6D9B29@DB8P190MB0634.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:21:47 +0000
From:   Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@...leissheimer.de>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
CC:     "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: [PATCH v2 2/4] leds: lp50xx: add setting of default intensity
 from DT

Hello Pavel,


> > > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > index f13117eed976..4b40bf66483c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > @@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ struct lp50xx_led {
> > > >  	struct led_classdev_mc mc_cdev;
> > > >  	struct lp50xx *priv;
> > > >  	unsigned long bank_modules;
> > > > -	int led_intensity[LP50XX_LEDS_PER_MODULE];
> > > >  	u8 ctrl_bank_enabled;
> > > >  	int led_number;
> > > >  };
> > >
> > > ? Does not make sense and changelog does not help.
> >
> > This is an unused variable which is in the driver
> > (same as the regulator). Should I provide a patch on its own for that
> > or just describe in the changelog?
> 
> Lets do separate patch here. DT changes will need Ack from Rob, this
> can go in directly.

Okay, I will submit a separate patch

> Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.

To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
for removing), sorry.

Best Regards,

   Sven