lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:15:55 +0100
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        david@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return
 entry pointer

On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:34:00 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 2/2/21 7:00 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
> > DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
> > 
> > Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
> > DAT_PROT: indicates that DAT protection applies because of the
> >           protection bit in the segment (or, if EDAT, region) tables
> > NOT_PTE: indicates that the address of the DAT table entry returned
> >          does not refer to a PTE, but to a segment or region table.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h |  5 ++++-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c    |  8 ++++----
> >  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > index 6d6b57059493..2d7bcbfb185e 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > @@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap
> > *sg, unsigned long saddr, rfte.val = ptr;
> >  			goto shadow_r2t;
> >  		}
> > +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rfx * 8;  
> 
> So pgt either is a table entry if rc > 0 or a pointer to the first pte
> on rc == 0 after this change?

yes

> Hrm, if it is really based on RCs than I might be able to come to
> terms with having two things in a ptr with the name pgt. But it needs
> a comment change.

will do.

> >  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rfx * 8,
> > &rfte.val); if (rc)
> >  			return rc;
> > @@ -1060,6 +1061,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap
> > *sg, unsigned long saddr, rste.val = ptr;
> >  			goto shadow_r3t;
> >  		}
> > +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rsx * 8;
> >  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rsx * 8,
> > &rste.val); if (rc)
> >  			return rc;
> > @@ -1087,6 +1089,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap
> > *sg, unsigned long saddr, rtte.val = ptr;
> >  			goto shadow_sgt;
> >  		}
> > +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rtx * 8;
> >  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rtx * 8,
> > &rtte.val); if (rc)
> >  			return rc;
> > @@ -1123,6 +1126,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap
> > *sg, unsigned long saddr, ste.val = ptr;
> >  			goto shadow_pgt;
> >  		}
> > +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.sx * 8;
> >  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.sx * 8,
> > &ste.val); if (rc)
> >  			return rc;
> > @@ -1157,6 +1161,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap
> > *sg, unsigned long saddr,
> >   * @vcpu: virtual cpu
> >   * @sg: pointer to the shadow guest address space structure
> >   * @saddr: faulting address in the shadow gmap
> > + * @pteptr: will contain the address of the faulting DAT table
> > entry, or of
> > + *          the valid leaf, plus some flags  
> 
> pteptr is not the right name if it can be two things

it cannot be two things there, kvm_s390_shadow_fault always returns a
DAT _entry_ (pte, segment, region).

> >   *
> >   * Returns: - 0 if the shadow fault was successfully resolved
> >   *	    - > 0 (pgm exception code) on exceptions while
> > faulting @@ -1165,11 +1171,11 @@ static int
> > kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
> >   *	    - -ENOMEM if out of memory
> >   */
> >  int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
> > -			  unsigned long saddr)
> > +			  unsigned long saddr, unsigned long
> > *pteptr) {
> >  	union vaddress vaddr;
> >  	union page_table_entry pte;
> > -	unsigned long pgt;
> > +	unsigned long pgt = 0;
> >  	int dat_protection, fake;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > @@ -1191,8 +1197,20 @@ int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu, struct gmap *sg, pte.val = pgt + vaddr.px * PAGE_SIZE;
> >  		goto shadow_page;
> >  	}
> > -	if (!rc)
> > -		rc = gmap_read_table(sg->parent, pgt + vaddr.px *
> > 8, &pte.val); +
> > +	switch (rc) {
> > +	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> > +	case PGM_REGION_THIRD_TRANS:
> > +	case PGM_REGION_SECOND_TRANS:
> > +	case PGM_REGION_FIRST_TRANS:
> > +		pgt |= NOT_PTE;  
> 
> GACC_TRANSL_ENTRY_INV ?

no, this is only for non-pte entries

> > +		break;
> > +	case 0:
> > +		pgt += vaddr.px * 8;
> > +		rc = gmap_read_table(sg->parent, pgt, &pte.val);
> > +	}
> > +	if (*pteptr)
> > +		*pteptr = pgt | dat_protection * DAT_PROT;
> >  	if (!rc && pte.i)
> >  		rc = PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION;
> >  	if (!rc && pte.z)
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> > index f4c51756c462..66a6e2cec97a 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> > @@ -359,7 +359,10 @@ void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > unsigned long gra); 
> > +#define DAT_PROT 2  
> 
> GACC_TRANSL_ENTRY_PROT

this is also only for non-pte entries

> > +#define NOT_PTE 4
> > +
> >  int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap
> > *shadow,
> > -			  unsigned long saddr);
> > +			  unsigned long saddr, unsigned long
> > *pteptr); 
> >  #endif /* __KVM_S390_GACCESS_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> > index c5d0a58b2c29..7db022141db3 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> > @@ -619,10 +619,10 @@ static int map_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct vsie_page *vsie_page) /* with mso/msl, the prefix lies at
> > offset *mso* */ prefix += scb_s->mso;
> >  
> > -	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, prefix);
> > +	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, prefix,
> > NULL); if (!rc && (scb_s->ecb & ECB_TE))
> >  		rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> > -					   prefix + PAGE_SIZE);
> > +					   prefix + PAGE_SIZE,
> > NULL); /*
> >  	 * We don't have to mprotect, we will be called for all
> > unshadows.
> >  	 * SIE will detect if protection applies and trigger a
> > validity. @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int handle_fault(struct
> > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
> > current->thread.gmap_addr, 1); 
> >  	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> > -				   current->thread.gmap_addr);
> > +				   current->thread.gmap_addr,
> > NULL); if (rc > 0) {
> >  		rc = inject_fault(vcpu, rc,
> >  				  current->thread.gmap_addr,
> > @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void handle_last_fault(struct kvm_vcpu
> > *vcpu, {
> >  	if (vsie_page->fault_addr)
> >  		kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> > -				      vsie_page->fault_addr);
> > +				      vsie_page->fault_addr,
> > NULL);  
> 
> Ok
> 
> >  	vsie_page->fault_addr = 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >   
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ