[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210205123235.1365780-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:02:35 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: jlbec@...lplan.org, hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: configfs: Fix sentence with a better word in the file symlink.c
s/fucking/wonderful/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
fs/configfs/symlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/configfs/symlink.c b/fs/configfs/symlink.c
index cb61467478ca..26676e27346b 100644
--- a/fs/configfs/symlink.c
+++ b/fs/configfs/symlink.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int configfs_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, const char *symna
* link(2) and symlink(2) - they wanted the target resolved
* at syscall time (as link(2) would've done), be a directory
* (which link(2) would've refused to do) *AND* be a deep
- * fucking magic, making the target busy from rmdir POV.
+ * wonderful magic, making the target busy from rmdir POV.
* symlink(2) is nothing of that sort, and the locking it
* gets matches the normal symlink(2) semantics. Without
* attempts to resolve the target (which might very well
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists