[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210205015219.2939361-1-xujia39@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:52:19 +0800
From: Xu Jia <xujia39@...wei.com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <revest@...omium.org>, <ast@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<xujia39@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: clean up for 'const static' in bpf_lsm.c
Prefer 'static const' over 'const static' here
Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <xujia39@...wei.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 1622a44d1617..75b1c678d558 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_bprm_opts_set, struct linux_binprm *, bprm, u64, flags)
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_bprm_opts_set_btf_ids, struct, linux_binprm)
-const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto = {
.func = bpf_bprm_opts_set,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static bool bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_ima_inode_hash_btf_ids, struct, inode)
-const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = {
.func = bpf_ima_inode_hash,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists