[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <161254816916.731861.2448215186785582734.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:52:50 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:41:52 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series fixes pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also improves
> its performance for normal hotplug memory. While here, it also reorganizes
> pfn_valid() on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. This series is based on v5.11-rc6.
>
> Question - should pfn_section_valid() be tested both for boot and non boot
> memory as well ?
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/mm), thanks!
[1/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/fccf0a3dfeaf
[2/2] arm64/mm: Reorganize pfn_valid()
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/387f3531116e
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists