[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjv9b61md0.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:59:55 +0000
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] sched/fair: Tweak misfit-related capacity checks
On 05/02/21 15:31, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 19:32, Valentin Schneider
> <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
>>
>> During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
>> out if they do not pass
>>
>> group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(<candidate group>, <local group>);
>
> group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity and group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity are
> removed in the next patch. Merge this and the next and directly remove
> them
>
OK.
>> @@ -8253,7 +8260,7 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
>> static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
>> {
>> return rq->misfit_task_load &&
>> - (rq->cpu_capacity_orig < rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity ||
>> + (capacity_greater(rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity, rq->cpu_capacity_orig) ||
>
> Why do you add a margin here whereas there was no margin before ?
>
Comparing capacities without any sort of filter can lead to ping-ponging
tasks around (capacity values very easily fluctuate by +/- 1, if not more).
I'm guilty of doing two things at once here: replace existing users, and
convert callsites that should be existing users. I can split the conversion
in a separate patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists