[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210205222842.34896-3-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 23:28:39 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax-device: Properly handle drivers without remove callback
If all resources are allocated in .probe() using devm_ functions it
might make sense to not provide a .remove() callback. Then the right
thing is to just return success.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
---
drivers/dax/bus.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
index 72fc4b9b9ae6..2c9e3f6f615f 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
@@ -178,8 +178,12 @@ static int dax_bus_remove(struct device *dev)
{
struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv = to_dax_drv(dev->driver);
struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
+ int ret = 0;
- return dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+ if (dax_drv->remove)
+ ret = dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+
+ return ret;
}
static struct bus_type dax_bus_type = {
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists