linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE1WUT6Hq=phyjW1Wv01nvG1fWOAZVEsNyrtKC6Tu37ABnU=dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:49:02 -0800
From:   Amy Parker <enbyamy@...il.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:     dsterba@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Richard Weinberger
<richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amy Parker <enbyamy@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote:
> > > > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained,
> > >
> > > Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point updating
> > > it to current coding style, deleting fs/efs is probably the best option.
> > >
> >
> > Wouldn't be surprised if there's a few systems out there that haven't
> > migrated at all.
>
> Before ripping it from the kernel source you could do a FUSE port of EFS.
> That way old filesystems can still get used on Linux.

A FUSE port of EFS would be a great idea. Know anyone that would be
interested in working on it? I might try picking it up if no one else
wants it, we'll see.