[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_f7BEbkOFtw_6_4fMcgGOWkujbqXhDbDcNstOxgvcPfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:45:21 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Make fw_devlink=on more forgiving
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> There are a lot of devices/drivers where they never have a struct device
> created for them or the driver initializes the hardware without ever
> binding to the struct device.
>
> This series is intended to avoid any boot regressions due to such
> devices/drivers when fw_devlink=on and also address the handling of
> optional suppliers.
>
> Patch 1 and 2 addresses the issue of firmware nodes that look like
> they'll have struct devices created for them, but will never actually
> have struct devices added for them. For example, DT nodes with a
> compatible property that don't have devices added for them.
>
> Patch 3 and 4 allow for handling optional DT bindings.
>
> Patch 5 sets up a generic API to handle drivers that never bind with
> their devices.
>
> Patch 6 through 8 update different frameworks to use the new API.
>
> Thanks,
> Saravana
>
Forgot to add version history:
v1 -> v2:
Patch 1: Added a flag to fwnodes that aren't devices.
Patch 3: New patch to ise the flag set in patch 1 to not create bad links.
v2 -> v3:
- Patch 1: Added Rafael's Ack
- New patches 3 and 4
v3 -> v4:
- No changes to patches 1-4.
- New patches 5-8.
-Saravana
> Saravana Kannan (8):
> driver core: fw_devlink: Detect supplier devices that will never be
> added
> of: property: Don't add links to absent suppliers
> driver core: Add fw_devlink.strict kernel param
> of: property: Add fw_devlink support for optional properties
> driver core: fw_devlink: Handle suppliers that don't use driver core
> irqdomain: Mark fwnodes when their irqdomain is added/removed
> PM: domains: Mark fwnodes when their powerdomain is added/removed
> clk: Mark fwnodes when their clock provider is added/removed
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 ++
> drivers/base/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 2 +
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 +
> drivers/of/property.c | 16 +++--
> include/linux/fwnode.h | 20 ++++++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 2 +
> 7 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists