linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8xx: Fix software emulation interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1612578497.zykn0q97ns.astroid@bobo.none>
Date:   Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:30:35 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/8xx: Fix software emulation interrupt

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 5, 2021 6:56 pm:
> For unimplemented instructions or unimplemented SPRs, the 8xx triggers
> a "Software Emulation Exception" (0x1000). That interrupt doesn't set
> reason bits in SRR1 as the "Program Check Exception" does.
> 
> Go through emulation_assist_interrupt() to set REASON_ILLEGAL.
> 
> Fixes: fbbcc3bb139e ("powerpc/8xx: Remove SoftwareEmulation()")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> ---
> I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be better to set REASON_ILLEGAL
> in the exception prolog and still call program_check_exception.
> And do the same in book3s/64 to avoid the nightmare of an
> INTERRUPT_HANDLER calling another INTERRUPT_HANDLER.

Hmm, I missed this. We just change program_check_exception to
a common function which is called by both.

Thanks,
Nick