linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: support sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:58:06 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        John Dias <joaodias@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: support sysfs

On 2/5/21 1:52 PM, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>>>> I takes your suggestion something like this.
>>>>
>>>> [alloc_range] could be order or range by interval
>>>>
>>>> /sys/kernel/mm/cma/cma-A/[alloc_range]/success
>>>> /sys/kernel/mm/cma/cma-A/[alloc_range]/fail
>>>> ..
>>>> ..
>>>> /sys/kernel/mm/cma/cma-Z/[alloc_range]/success
>>>> /sys/kernel/mm/cma/cma-Z/[alloc_range]/fail
> 
> The interface above seems to me the most useful actually, if by
> [alloc_range] you mean the different allocation orders. This would
> cover Minchan's per-CMA failure tracking and would also allow us to
> understand what kind of allocations are failing and therefore if the
> problem is caused by pinning/fragmentation or by over-utilization.
> 

I agree. That seems about right, now that we've established that
cma areas are a must-have.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA