[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YB6PN8VsVo4pNxCb@chrisdown.name>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 12:44:39 +0000
From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-team@...com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Userspace format enumeration support
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>> > I'm not against the idea. I don't think it belongs in /proc. Perhaps
>> > debugfs is a better place to put it.
>>
>> Any location is fine with me, as long as it gets to userspace. How does
>> <debugfs>/printk/formats or <debugfs>/printk/formats/<module> sound to you?
>
>That's fine with me, but I'd like to see the patch with this in it first
>before approving it :)
Thanks! I'll send v2 soon then with the aforementioned changes, and a move to
debugfs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists