[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+b3jpjnWeDeUmn8TZ6KvQCu3riip0R07JjNwiOjsRYy6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:07:02 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
GCC Development <gcc@....gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 9/9] x86/mm: Implement PR_SET/GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL with LAM
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:43 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:16 AM Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Provide prctl() interface to enabled LAM for user addresses. Depending
> > how many tag bits requested it may result in enabling LAM_U57 or
> > LAM_U48.
>
> I prefer the alternate kernel interface based on CET arch_prctl interface which
> is implemented in glibc on users/intel/lam/master branch:
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-glibc/glibc/-/tree/users/intel/lam/master
>
> and in GCC on users/intel/lam/master branch:
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/intel/lam/master
Hi Kirill, H.J.,
I don't have strong preference for PR_SET/GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL vs
ARCH_X86_FEATURE_1_ENABLE itself, but tying LAM to ELF and
GNU_PROPERTY in the second option looks strange. LAM can be used
outside of ELF/GNU, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists