linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fix incorrectly defined global

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:33:26 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: emxx_udc: Fix incorrectly defined global

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 01:08:27PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 12:04:41PM IST, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Given that drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h is only included by
> > drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c, shouldn't these variables just be
> > declared static in emxx_udc.c and removed from emxx_udc.h?
> >
> 
> Either would be correct. I went this way because it was originally trying to
> (incorrectly) define a global variable instead. I guess they can be static now
> and when more users are added, the linkage can be adjusted as needed.
> 
> Here's another version of the patch:

<snip>

Please resend in the proper format that a second version of a patch
should be in (the documentation describes how to do this.)

thanks,

greg k-h