[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1612697823-8073-16-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 19:36:46 +0800
From: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
To: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>, Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-next 15/32] scsi: initio: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ
It is redundant to do irqsave and irqrestore in hardIRQ context, where
it has been in a irq-disabled context.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/initio.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/initio.c b/drivers/scsi/initio.c
index 814acc5..3fafa8f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/initio.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/initio.c
@@ -2507,12 +2507,11 @@ static int initio_wait_done_disc(struct initio_host * host)
static irqreturn_t i91u_intr(int irqno, void *dev_id)
{
struct Scsi_Host *dev = dev_id;
- unsigned long flags;
int r;
- spin_lock_irqsave(dev->host_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(dev->host_lock);
r = initio_isr((struct initio_host *)dev->hostdata);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(dev->host_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(dev->host_lock);
if (r)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
else
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists