linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Disallow CONFIG_TMPFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210207144831.lsrm74ypbz7i37uz@box>
Date:   Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:48:31 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Disallow CONFIG_TMPFS_INODE64 on s390

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:06:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This feature requires ino_t be 64-bits, which is true for every
> 64-bit architecture but s390, so prevent this option from being
> selected there.

Quick grep suggests the same for alpha. Am I wrong?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov