linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <661b9809-2c6a-5fc8-163b-a159b84c9ab8@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:19:14 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7

On 2/7/21 9:58 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:49:18AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:40 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
>>> - Disable CET instrumentation in the kernel so that gcc doesn't add
>>> ENDBR64 to kernel code and thus confuse tracing.
>> So this is clearly the right thing to do for now, but I wonder if
>> people have a plan for actually enabling CET and endbr at cpl0 at some
>> point?
> It probably is an item on some Intel manager's to-enable list. So far,
> the CET enablement concentrates only on userspace but dhansen might know
> more about future plans. CCed.

It's definitely on our radar to look at after CET userspace.

The only question for me is whether it will be worth doing with the
exiting kernel entry/exit architecture.