[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCBYqtPdFAxjkKhA@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 23:16:26 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Drop racy follow_pfn check
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:43:24AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:26 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 07:45:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > References: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20201127164131.2244124-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch/
> >
> > What is the difference between this and "Link:" anyway?
>
> Afaik References: is for other reading (bug reports, discussions,
> other patch series), Link: is for patch submission itself (which I
> think some subsystem do an entire chain of, on each revision). My
> scripts aren't good enough that they add the Link: before submitting,
> I add them when I apply patches (since most patches I get don't have
> them anyway).
>
> btw since the final patch to remove follow_pfn won't be ready for 5.12
> merge window (kvm and vfio have some work to do) I think it's best if
> you just queue this up in your tree?
Boris has queued this to tip x86/sgx.
> Thanks, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists