linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.4.256

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YCFy7ot/xo427FX4@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:20:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, lwn@....net, jslaby@...e.cz,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: Linux 4.4.256

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:14:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:22:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > There are lots (35) of "KERNEL_VERSION(4, 5, 0)" in chromeos-4.4.
> > > That should not matter with the clamped LINUX_VERSION_CODE, but
> > > I'd prefer to clamp KERNEL_VERSION as well just to be sure. On
> > > top of that, some of the vendor code we carry along does check
> > > SUBVERSION, but that is probably more of an academic concern.
> > 
> > Ah, the internal checks, I think the other patch by Sasha will let that
> > get bigger and should work for you as well.  Can you try it out?
> > 
> Quite frankly I like the "complete" fix much better, but then I dislike
> deviating from stable releases even more. I'll use Sasha's version.

We will backport the "complete" fix soon when it hits Linus's tree.

thanks,

greg k-h